Bangladesh vs Mauritania, Islamic Republic of: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 2 data services score

Bangladesh
63.47 scale 0-100
in 2024
Mauritania, Islamic Republic of
63.9 scale 0-100
in 2024
Bangladesh rank
129th
Mauritania, Islamic Republic of rank
127th

Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 2 data services score over time

  • Bangladesh
  • Mauritania, Islamic Republic of
204060201620202024

How they compare

Mauritania, Islamic Republic of currently reports 63.9 scale 0-100 against 63.47 scale 0-100 in Bangladesh, a difference of 0.43 scale 0-100.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Bangladesh ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 129th and Mauritania, Islamic Republic of ranks 127th of 183 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 1 and Mauritania, Islamic Republic of in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh Mauritania, Islamic Republic of Difference Ahead
2010s 57.03 scale 0-100 40.97 scale 0-100 16.07 scale 0-100 Bangladesh
2020s 61.68 scale 0-100 62.42 scale 0-100 0.74 scale 0-100 Mauritania, Islamic Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 2 data services score, Bangladesh or Mauritania, Islamic Republic of?
Mauritania, Islamic Republic of, at 63.9 scale 0-100 against 63.47 scale 0-100 in Bangladesh as of 2024.
What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 2 data services score between Bangladesh and Mauritania, Islamic Republic of?
0.43 scale 0-100, with Mauritania, Islamic Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and Mauritania, Islamic Republic of?
9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
How do Bangladesh and Mauritania, Islamic Republic of rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 2 data services score?
Bangladesh ranks 129th and Mauritania, Islamic Republic of ranks 127th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 2 data services score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs Mauritania, Islamic Republic of: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 2 data services score. Statizoid, drawing on Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-2-data-services-score-scale-0-100/bangladesh/mauritania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-2-data-services-score-scale-0-100/bangladesh/mauritania/">Bangladesh vs Mauritania, Islamic Republic of: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 2 data services score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 2 data services score (scale 0-100)
Unit
scale 0-100
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
187 places, 1,643 data points, 2016–2024
Last refreshed

The data services pillar overall score is a composite indicator based on four dimensions of data services: (i) the quality of data releases, (ii) the richness and openness of online access, (iii) the effectiveness of advisory and analytical services related to statistics, and (iv) the availability and use of data access services such as secure microdata access. Advisory and analytical services might incorporate elements related to data stewardship services including input to national data strategies, advice on data ethics and calling out misuse of data in accordance with the Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics.