Belarus vs Kyrgyzstan: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 2 data services score
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 2 data services score over time
- Belarus
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 53.8 scale 0-100 against 50.87 scale 0-100 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 2.93 scale 0-100.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Belarus ranks 158th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 159th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 62.65 scale 0-100 | 82.02 scale 0-100 | 19.37 scale 0-100 | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 73.07 scale 0-100 | 68.55 scale 0-100 | 4.52 scale 0-100 | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 2 data services score, Belarus or Kyrgyzstan?
- Belarus, at 53.8 scale 0-100 against 50.87 scale 0-100 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 2 data services score between Belarus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 2.93 scale 0-100, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
- How do Belarus and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 2 data services score?
- Belarus ranks 158th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 159th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 2 data services score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The data services pillar overall score is a composite indicator based on four dimensions of data services: (i) the quality of data releases, (ii) the richness and openness of online access, (iii) the effectiveness of advisory and analytical services related to statistics, and (iv) the availability and use of data access services such as secure microdata access. Advisory and analytical services might incorporate elements related to data stewardship services including input to national data strategies, advice on data ethics and calling out misuse of data in accordance with the Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics.