Brazil vs Costa Rica: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 2 data services score
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 2 data services score over time
- Brazil
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 88.97 scale 0-100 against 88.97 scale 0-100 in Costa Rica, a difference of 0 scale 0-100.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 49th and Costa Rica ranks 49th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 1 and Costa Rica in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 81.67 scale 0-100 | 82.96 scale 0-100 | 1.29 scale 0-100 | Costa Rica |
| 2020s | 87.53 scale 0-100 | 87.27 scale 0-100 | 0.2533 scale 0-100 | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 2 data services score, Brazil or Costa Rica?
- Brazil, at 88.97 scale 0-100 against 88.97 scale 0-100 in Costa Rica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 2 data services score between Brazil and Costa Rica?
- 0 scale 0-100, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Costa Rica?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and Costa Rica rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 2 data services score?
- Brazil ranks 49th and Costa Rica ranks 49th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 2 data services score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The data services pillar overall score is a composite indicator based on four dimensions of data services: (i) the quality of data releases, (ii) the richness and openness of online access, (iii) the effectiveness of advisory and analytical services related to statistics, and (iv) the availability and use of data access services such as secure microdata access. Advisory and analytical services might incorporate elements related to data stewardship services including input to national data strategies, advice on data ethics and calling out misuse of data in accordance with the Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics.