Cape Verde vs Guinea: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 2 data services score
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 2 data services score over time
- Cape Verde
- Guinea
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 31.8 scale 0-100 against 30.6 scale 0-100 in Guinea, a difference of 1.2 scale 0-100.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Guinea ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 166th and Guinea ranks 168th of 182 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 1 and Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 55.23 scale 0-100 | 57.98 scale 0-100 | 2.74 scale 0-100 | Guinea |
| 2020s | 51.48 scale 0-100 | 49.27 scale 0-100 | 2.21 scale 0-100 | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 2 data services score, Cape Verde or Guinea?
- Cape Verde, at 31.8 scale 0-100 against 30.6 scale 0-100 in Guinea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 2 data services score between Cape Verde and Guinea?
- 1.2 scale 0-100, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Guinea?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
- How do Cape Verde and Guinea rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 2 data services score?
- Cape Verde ranks 166th and Guinea ranks 168th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 2 data services score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The data services pillar overall score is a composite indicator based on four dimensions of data services: (i) the quality of data releases, (ii) the richness and openness of online access, (iii) the effectiveness of advisory and analytical services related to statistics, and (iv) the availability and use of data access services such as secure microdata access. Advisory and analytical services might incorporate elements related to data stewardship services including input to national data strategies, advice on data ethics and calling out misuse of data in accordance with the Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics.