Chile vs North Macedonia: Statistical performance: Pillar 2 data services score (scale)
Statistical performance: Pillar 2 data services score (scale) over time
- Chile
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Chile currently reports 88.23 scale 0-100 against 88.23 scale 0-100 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0 scale 0-100.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 52nd and North Macedonia ranks 52nd of 184 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and North Macedonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 77.43 scale 0-100 | 70.63 scale 0-100 | 6.81 scale 0-100 | Chile |
| 2020s | 82.94 scale 0-100 | 87.87 scale 0-100 | 4.93 scale 0-100 | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 2 data services score, Chile or North Macedonia?
- Chile, at 88.23 scale 0-100 against 88.23 scale 0-100 in North Macedonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 2 data services score between Chile and North Macedonia?
- 0 scale 0-100, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and North Macedonia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
- How do Chile and North Macedonia rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 2 data services score?
- Chile ranks 52nd and North Macedonia ranks 52nd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 2 data services score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The data services pillar overall score is a composite indicator based on four dimensions of data services: (i) the quality of data releases, (ii) the richness and openness of online access, (iii) the effectiveness of advisory and analytical services related to statistics, and (iv) the availability and use of data access services such as secure microdata access. Advisory and analytical services might incorporate elements related to data stewardship services including input to national data strategies, advice on data ethics and calling out misuse of data in accordance with the Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics.