High income vs Poland: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 2 data services score
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 2 data services score over time
- High income
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 99 scale 0-100 against 82.48 scale 0-100 in High income, a difference of 16.52 scale 0-100.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.2 times High income's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2016 it was High income ahead.
High income ranks 1st and Poland ranks 2nd of 5 groups.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | High income | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 74 scale 0-100 | 77.57 scale 0-100 | 3.56 scale 0-100 | Poland |
| 2020s | 81.93 scale 0-100 | 97.23 scale 0-100 | 15.29 scale 0-100 | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 2 data services score, High income or Poland?
- Poland, at 99 scale 0-100 against 82.48 scale 0-100 in High income as of 2024.
- What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 2 data services score between High income and Poland?
- 16.52 scale 0-100, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for High income and Poland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
- How do High income and Poland rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 2 data services score?
- High income ranks 1st and Poland ranks 2nd of 5 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 2 data services score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The data services pillar overall score is a composite indicator based on four dimensions of data services: (i) the quality of data releases, (ii) the richness and openness of online access, (iii) the effectiveness of advisory and analytical services related to statistics, and (iv) the availability and use of data access services such as secure microdata access. Advisory and analytical services might incorporate elements related to data stewardship services including input to national data strategies, advice on data ethics and calling out misuse of data in accordance with the Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics.