Iceland vs Kiribati: Statistical performance: Pillar 2 data services score (scale)
Statistical performance: Pillar 2 data services score (scale) over time
- Iceland
- Kiribati
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 63.07 scale 0-100 against 62.83 scale 0-100 in Iceland, a difference of 0.24 scale 0-100.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 137th and Kiribati ranks 134th of 184 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 70.27 scale 0-100 | 21.31 scale 0-100 | 48.96 scale 0-100 | Iceland |
| 2020s | 75.22 scale 0-100 | 60.2 scale 0-100 | 15.02 scale 0-100 | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 2 data services score, Iceland or Kiribati?
- Kiribati, at 63.07 scale 0-100 against 62.83 scale 0-100 in Iceland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 2 data services score between Iceland and Kiribati?
- 0.24 scale 0-100, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Kiribati?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
- How do Iceland and Kiribati rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 2 data services score?
- Iceland ranks 137th and Kiribati ranks 134th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 2 data services score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The data services pillar overall score is a composite indicator based on four dimensions of data services: (i) the quality of data releases, (ii) the richness and openness of online access, (iii) the effectiveness of advisory and analytical services related to statistics, and (iv) the availability and use of data access services such as secure microdata access. Advisory and analytical services might incorporate elements related to data stewardship services including input to national data strategies, advice on data ethics and calling out misuse of data in accordance with the Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics.