Kiribati vs Nicaragua: Statistical performance: Pillar 2 data services score (scale)
Statistical performance: Pillar 2 data services score (scale) over time
- Kiribati
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 63.2 scale 0-100 against 63.07 scale 0-100 in Kiribati, a difference of 0.13 scale 0-100.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Nicaragua has been ahead every year.
Kiribati ranks 134th and Nicaragua ranks 132nd of 184 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 21.31 scale 0-100 | 39.84 scale 0-100 | 18.53 scale 0-100 | Nicaragua |
| 2020s | 60.2 scale 0-100 | 61.21 scale 0-100 | 1.01 scale 0-100 | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 2 data services score, Kiribati or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 63.2 scale 0-100 against 63.07 scale 0-100 in Kiribati as of 2024.
- What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 2 data services score between Kiribati and Nicaragua?
- 0.13 scale 0-100, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Nicaragua?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
- How do Kiribati and Nicaragua rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 2 data services score?
- Kiribati ranks 134th and Nicaragua ranks 132nd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 2 data services score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The data services pillar overall score is a composite indicator based on four dimensions of data services: (i) the quality of data releases, (ii) the richness and openness of online access, (iii) the effectiveness of advisory and analytical services related to statistics, and (iv) the availability and use of data access services such as secure microdata access. Advisory and analytical services might incorporate elements related to data stewardship services including input to national data strategies, advice on data ethics and calling out misuse of data in accordance with the Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics.