New Zealand vs Romania: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 2 data services score
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 2 data services score over time
- New Zealand
- Romania
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 94.9 scale 0-100 against 94.7 scale 0-100 in Romania, a difference of 0.2 scale 0-100.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2017 it was New Zealand ahead.
New Zealand ranks 24th and Romania ranks 25th of 183 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 91.7 scale 0-100 | 84.32 scale 0-100 | 7.38 scale 0-100 | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 93.5 scale 0-100 | 93.05 scale 0-100 | 0.4533 scale 0-100 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 2 data services score, New Zealand or Romania?
- New Zealand, at 94.9 scale 0-100 against 94.7 scale 0-100 in Romania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 2 data services score between New Zealand and Romania?
- 0.2 scale 0-100, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Romania?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2024.
- How do New Zealand and Romania rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 2 data services score?
- New Zealand ranks 24th and Romania ranks 25th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 2 data services score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The data services pillar overall score is a composite indicator based on four dimensions of data services: (i) the quality of data releases, (ii) the richness and openness of online access, (iii) the effectiveness of advisory and analytical services related to statistics, and (iv) the availability and use of data access services such as secure microdata access. Advisory and analytical services might incorporate elements related to data stewardship services including input to national data strategies, advice on data ethics and calling out misuse of data in accordance with the Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics.