North Macedonia vs Thailand: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 2 data services score
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 2 data services score over time
- North Macedonia
- Thailand
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 88.23 scale 0-100 against 87.93 scale 0-100 in Thailand, a difference of 0.3 scale 0-100.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Thailand ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 52nd and Thailand ranks 55th of 183 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, North Macedonia averaged higher in 1 and Thailand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 70.63 scale 0-100 | 77.08 scale 0-100 | 6.46 scale 0-100 | Thailand |
| 2020s | 87.87 scale 0-100 | 81.95 scale 0-100 | 5.93 scale 0-100 | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 2 data services score, North Macedonia or Thailand?
- North Macedonia, at 88.23 scale 0-100 against 87.93 scale 0-100 in Thailand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 2 data services score between North Macedonia and Thailand?
- 0.3 scale 0-100, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Thailand?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
- How do North Macedonia and Thailand rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 2 data services score?
- North Macedonia ranks 52nd and Thailand ranks 55th of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 2 data services score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The data services pillar overall score is a composite indicator based on four dimensions of data services: (i) the quality of data releases, (ii) the richness and openness of online access, (iii) the effectiveness of advisory and analytical services related to statistics, and (iv) the availability and use of data access services such as secure microdata access. Advisory and analytical services might incorporate elements related to data stewardship services including input to national data strategies, advice on data ethics and calling out misuse of data in accordance with the Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics.