Papua New Guinea vs Zambia: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 2 data services score
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 2 data services score over time
- Papua New Guinea
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 62.53 scale 0-100 against 62.23 scale 0-100 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.3 scale 0-100.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Papua New Guinea ranks 144th and Zambia ranks 141st of 183 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Papua New Guinea | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 34.23 scale 0-100 | 52.96 scale 0-100 | 18.73 scale 0-100 | Zambia |
| 2020s | 59.26 scale 0-100 | 63.87 scale 0-100 | 4.61 scale 0-100 | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 2 data services score, Papua New Guinea or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 62.53 scale 0-100 against 62.23 scale 0-100 in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 2 data services score between Papua New Guinea and Zambia?
- 0.3 scale 0-100, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Papua New Guinea and Zambia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
- How do Papua New Guinea and Zambia rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 2 data services score?
- Papua New Guinea ranks 144th and Zambia ranks 141st of 183 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 2 data services score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The data services pillar overall score is a composite indicator based on four dimensions of data services: (i) the quality of data releases, (ii) the richness and openness of online access, (iii) the effectiveness of advisory and analytical services related to statistics, and (iv) the availability and use of data access services such as secure microdata access. Advisory and analytical services might incorporate elements related to data stewardship services including input to national data strategies, advice on data ethics and calling out misuse of data in accordance with the Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics.