Paraguay vs Suriname: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 2 data services score
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 2 data services score over time
- Paraguay
- Suriname
How they compare
Paraguay currently reports 74.03 scale 0-100 against 72.63 scale 0-100 in Suriname, a difference of 1.4 scale 0-100.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Paraguay ahead.
Paraguay ranks 79th and Suriname ranks 81st of 182 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Paraguay averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Paraguay | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 57.42 scale 0-100 | 41.71 scale 0-100 | 15.71 scale 0-100 | Paraguay |
| 2020s | 66.7 scale 0-100 | 69.03 scale 0-100 | 2.33 scale 0-100 | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 2 data services score, Paraguay or Suriname?
- Paraguay, at 74.03 scale 0-100 against 72.63 scale 0-100 in Suriname as of 2024.
- What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 2 data services score between Paraguay and Suriname?
- 1.4 scale 0-100, with Paraguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Paraguay and Suriname?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
- How do Paraguay and Suriname rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 2 data services score?
- Paraguay ranks 79th and Suriname ranks 81st of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 2 data services score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The data services pillar overall score is a composite indicator based on four dimensions of data services: (i) the quality of data releases, (ii) the richness and openness of online access, (iii) the effectiveness of advisory and analytical services related to statistics, and (iv) the availability and use of data access services such as secure microdata access. Advisory and analytical services might incorporate elements related to data stewardship services including input to national data strategies, advice on data ethics and calling out misuse of data in accordance with the Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics.