Algeria vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score

Algeria
67.99 scale 0-100
in 2024
Lao People's Democratic Republic
67.38 scale 0-100
in 2024
Algeria rank
129th
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
132nd

Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score over time

  • Algeria
  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
020406080200520142024

How they compare

Algeria currently reports 67.99 scale 0-100 against 67.38 scale 0-100 in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 0.61 scale 0-100.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.

Algeria ranks 129th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 132nd of 215 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Algeria averaged higher in 1 and Lao People's Democratic Republic in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Algeria Lao People's Democratic Republic Difference Ahead
2000s 56.31 scale 0-100 58.88 scale 0-100 2.57 scale 0-100 Lao People's Democratic Republic
2010s 54.73 scale 0-100 59.86 scale 0-100 5.14 scale 0-100 Lao People's Democratic Republic
2020s 74.09 scale 0-100 70.1 scale 0-100 3.99 scale 0-100 Algeria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 3 data products score, Algeria or Lao People's Democratic Republic?
Algeria, at 67.99 scale 0-100 against 67.38 scale 0-100 in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2024.
What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 3 data products score between Algeria and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
0.61 scale 0-100, with Algeria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Lao People's Democratic Republic?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do Algeria and Lao People's Democratic Republic rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 3 data products score?
Algeria ranks 129th and Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 132nd of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Algeria vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score. Statizoid, drawing on Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-3-data-products-score-scale-0-100/algeria/lao-pdr/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-3-data-products-score-scale-0-100/algeria/lao-pdr/">Algeria vs Lao People's Democratic Republic: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score (scale 0-100)
Unit
scale 0-100
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
219 places, 4,336 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed

The data products overall score is a composite score measuring whether the country is able to produce relevant indicators, primarily related to SDGs. The data products (internal process) pillar is segmented by four topics and organized into (i) social, (ii) economic, (iii) environmental, and (iv) institutional dimensions using the typology of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This approach anchors the national statistical system's performance around the essential data required to support the achievement of the 2030 global goals, and enables comparisons across countries so that a global view can be generated while enabling country specific emphasis to reflect the user needs of that country.