Aruba vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score

Aruba
25.98 scale 0-100
in 2024
Turks and Caicos Islands
28.2 scale 0-100
in 2024
Aruba rank
204th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
201st

Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score over time

  • Aruba
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
1015202530200520142024

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 28.2 scale 0-100 against 25.98 scale 0-100 in Aruba, a difference of 2.22 scale 0-100.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.1 times Aruba's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Aruba ahead.

Aruba ranks 204th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 201st of 215 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 2 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 19.17 scale 0-100 13.99 scale 0-100 5.17 scale 0-100 Aruba
2010s 18.23 scale 0-100 12.34 scale 0-100 5.89 scale 0-100 Aruba
2020s 25.98 scale 0-100 28.71 scale 0-100 2.73 scale 0-100 Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 3 data products score, Aruba or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 28.2 scale 0-100 against 25.98 scale 0-100 in Aruba as of 2024.
What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 3 data products score between Aruba and Turks and Caicos Islands?
2.22 scale 0-100, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Turks and Caicos Islands?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do Aruba and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 3 data products score?
Aruba ranks 204th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 201st of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score. Statizoid, drawing on Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-3-data-products-score-scale-0-100/aruba/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-3-data-products-score-scale-0-100/aruba/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Aruba vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score (scale 0-100)
Unit
scale 0-100
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
219 places, 4,336 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed

The data products overall score is a composite score measuring whether the country is able to produce relevant indicators, primarily related to SDGs. The data products (internal process) pillar is segmented by four topics and organized into (i) social, (ii) economic, (iii) environmental, and (iv) institutional dimensions using the typology of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This approach anchors the national statistical system's performance around the essential data required to support the achievement of the 2030 global goals, and enables comparisons across countries so that a global view can be generated while enabling country specific emphasis to reflect the user needs of that country.