Azerbaijan vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score

Azerbaijan
74.22 scale 0-100
in 2024
Bosnia and Herzegovina
73.77 scale 0-100
in 2024
Azerbaijan rank
102nd
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
105th

Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
020406080200520142024

How they compare

Azerbaijan currently reports 74.22 scale 0-100 against 73.77 scale 0-100 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.45 scale 0-100.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Azerbaijan ahead.

Azerbaijan ranks 102nd and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 105th of 215 countries.

Azerbaijan has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan Bosnia and Herzegovina Difference Ahead
2000s 62.47 scale 0-100 57.4 scale 0-100 5.07 scale 0-100 Azerbaijan
2010s 60.38 scale 0-100 57.68 scale 0-100 2.71 scale 0-100 Azerbaijan
2020s 73.8 scale 0-100 72.15 scale 0-100 1.65 scale 0-100 Azerbaijan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 3 data products score, Azerbaijan or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
Azerbaijan, at 74.22 scale 0-100 against 73.77 scale 0-100 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2024.
What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 3 data products score between Azerbaijan and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
0.45 scale 0-100, with Azerbaijan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do Azerbaijan and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 3 data products score?
Azerbaijan ranks 102nd and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 105th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Azerbaijan vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score. Statizoid, drawing on Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-3-data-products-score-scale-0-100/azerbaijan/bosnia-and-herzegovina/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-3-data-products-score-scale-0-100/azerbaijan/bosnia-and-herzegovina/">Azerbaijan vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score (scale 0-100)
Unit
scale 0-100
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
219 places, 4,336 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed

The data products overall score is a composite score measuring whether the country is able to produce relevant indicators, primarily related to SDGs. The data products (internal process) pillar is segmented by four topics and organized into (i) social, (ii) economic, (iii) environmental, and (iv) institutional dimensions using the typology of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This approach anchors the national statistical system's performance around the essential data required to support the achievement of the 2030 global goals, and enables comparisons across countries so that a global view can be generated while enabling country specific emphasis to reflect the user needs of that country.