China (People’s Republic of) vs Mozambique: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score

China (People’s Republic of)
76.6 scale 0-100
in 2024
Mozambique
76.24 scale 0-100
in 2024
China (People’s Republic of) rank
86th
Mozambique rank
87th

Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score over time

  • China (People’s Republic of)
  • Mozambique
020406080200520142024

How they compare

China (People’s Republic of) currently reports 76.6 scale 0-100 against 76.24 scale 0-100 in Mozambique, a difference of 0.36 scale 0-100.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Mozambique ahead.

China (People’s Republic of) ranks 86th and Mozambique ranks 87th of 215 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, China (People’s Republic of) averaged higher in 1 and Mozambique in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade China (People’s Republic of) Mozambique Difference Ahead
2000s 49.1 scale 0-100 58.57 scale 0-100 9.47 scale 0-100 Mozambique
2010s 55.49 scale 0-100 64.08 scale 0-100 8.59 scale 0-100 Mozambique
2020s 74.34 scale 0-100 72.13 scale 0-100 2.21 scale 0-100 China (People’s Republic of)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 3 data products score, China (People’s Republic of) or Mozambique?
China (People’s Republic of), at 76.6 scale 0-100 against 76.24 scale 0-100 in Mozambique as of 2024.
What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 3 data products score between China (People’s Republic of) and Mozambique?
0.36 scale 0-100, with China (People’s Republic of) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China (People’s Republic of) and Mozambique?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do China (People’s Republic of) and Mozambique rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 3 data products score?
China (People’s Republic of) ranks 86th and Mozambique ranks 87th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China (People’s Republic of) vs Mozambique: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score. Statizoid, drawing on Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-3-data-products-score-scale-0-100/china/mozambique/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-3-data-products-score-scale-0-100/china/mozambique/">China (People’s Republic of) vs Mozambique: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score (scale 0-100)
Unit
scale 0-100
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
219 places, 4,336 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed

The data products overall score is a composite score measuring whether the country is able to produce relevant indicators, primarily related to SDGs. The data products (internal process) pillar is segmented by four topics and organized into (i) social, (ii) economic, (iii) environmental, and (iv) institutional dimensions using the typology of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This approach anchors the national statistical system's performance around the essential data required to support the achievement of the 2030 global goals, and enables comparisons across countries so that a global view can be generated while enabling country specific emphasis to reflect the user needs of that country.