Croatia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score

Croatia
81.77 scale 0-100
in 2024
United Republic of Tanzania
81.92 scale 0-100
in 2024
Croatia rank
47th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
45th

Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score over time

  • Croatia
  • United Republic of Tanzania
020406080200520142024

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 81.92 scale 0-100 against 81.77 scale 0-100 in Croatia, a difference of 0.15 scale 0-100.

Across all 20 years both countries report, United Republic of Tanzania has been ahead every year.

Croatia ranks 47th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 45th of 215 countries.

United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 51.05 scale 0-100 63.68 scale 0-100 12.62 scale 0-100 United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 53.59 scale 0-100 70.29 scale 0-100 16.69 scale 0-100 United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 72.29 scale 0-100 78.62 scale 0-100 6.32 scale 0-100 United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 3 data products score, Croatia or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 81.92 scale 0-100 against 81.77 scale 0-100 in Croatia as of 2024.
What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 3 data products score between Croatia and United Republic of Tanzania?
0.15 scale 0-100, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and United Republic of Tanzania?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do Croatia and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 3 data products score?
Croatia ranks 47th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 45th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score. Statizoid, drawing on Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-3-data-products-score-scale-0-100/croatia/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-3-data-products-score-scale-0-100/croatia/tanzania/">Croatia vs United Republic of Tanzania: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score (scale 0-100)
Unit
scale 0-100
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
219 places, 4,336 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed

The data products overall score is a composite score measuring whether the country is able to produce relevant indicators, primarily related to SDGs. The data products (internal process) pillar is segmented by four topics and organized into (i) social, (ii) economic, (iii) environmental, and (iv) institutional dimensions using the typology of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This approach anchors the national statistical system's performance around the essential data required to support the achievement of the 2030 global goals, and enables comparisons across countries so that a global view can be generated while enabling country specific emphasis to reflect the user needs of that country.