Equatorial Guinea, Republic of vs Suriname: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score

Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
60.41 scale 0-100
in 2024
Suriname
60.88 scale 0-100
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of rank
164th
Suriname rank
163rd

Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score over time

  • Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
  • Suriname
0204060200520142024

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 60.88 scale 0-100 against 60.41 scale 0-100 in Equatorial Guinea, Republic of, a difference of 0.47 scale 0-100.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ahead.

Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ranks 164th and Suriname ranks 163rd of 215 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea, Republic of averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea, Republic of Suriname Difference Ahead
2000s 39.9 scale 0-100 42.54 scale 0-100 2.64 scale 0-100 Suriname
2010s 49.11 scale 0-100 44.08 scale 0-100 5.03 scale 0-100 Equatorial Guinea, Republic of
2020s 57.56 scale 0-100 63.59 scale 0-100 6.03 scale 0-100 Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 3 data products score, Equatorial Guinea, Republic of or Suriname?
Suriname, at 60.88 scale 0-100 against 60.41 scale 0-100 in Equatorial Guinea, Republic of as of 2024.
What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 3 data products score between Equatorial Guinea, Republic of and Suriname?
0.47 scale 0-100, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea, Republic of and Suriname?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea, Republic of and Suriname rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 3 data products score?
Equatorial Guinea, Republic of ranks 164th and Suriname ranks 163rd of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea, Republic of vs Suriname: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score. Statizoid, drawing on Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-3-data-products-score-scale-0-100/equatorial-guinea/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-3-data-products-score-scale-0-100/equatorial-guinea/suriname/">Equatorial Guinea, Republic of vs Suriname: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score (scale 0-100)
Unit
scale 0-100
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
219 places, 4,336 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed

The data products overall score is a composite score measuring whether the country is able to produce relevant indicators, primarily related to SDGs. The data products (internal process) pillar is segmented by four topics and organized into (i) social, (ii) economic, (iii) environmental, and (iv) institutional dimensions using the typology of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This approach anchors the national statistical system's performance around the essential data required to support the achievement of the 2030 global goals, and enables comparisons across countries so that a global view can be generated while enabling country specific emphasis to reflect the user needs of that country.