French Polynesia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score

French Polynesia
28.43 scale 0-100
in 2024
Turks and Caicos Islands
28.2 scale 0-100
in 2024
French Polynesia rank
200th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
201st

Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score over time

  • French Polynesia
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
1015202530200520142024

How they compare

French Polynesia currently reports 28.43 scale 0-100 against 28.2 scale 0-100 in Turks and Caicos Islands, a difference of 0.23 scale 0-100.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was French Polynesia ahead.

French Polynesia ranks 200th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 201st of 215 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, French Polynesia averaged higher in 2 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade French Polynesia Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 21.54 scale 0-100 13.99 scale 0-100 7.55 scale 0-100 French Polynesia
2010s 15.26 scale 0-100 12.34 scale 0-100 2.92 scale 0-100 French Polynesia
2020s 25.58 scale 0-100 28.71 scale 0-100 3.13 scale 0-100 Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 3 data products score, French Polynesia or Turks and Caicos Islands?
French Polynesia, at 28.43 scale 0-100 against 28.2 scale 0-100 in Turks and Caicos Islands as of 2024.
What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 3 data products score between French Polynesia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.23 scale 0-100, with French Polynesia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for French Polynesia and Turks and Caicos Islands?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do French Polynesia and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 3 data products score?
French Polynesia ranks 200th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 201st of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

French Polynesia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score. Statizoid, drawing on Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-3-data-products-score-scale-0-100/french-polynesia/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-3-data-products-score-scale-0-100/french-polynesia/turks-and-caicos-islands/">French Polynesia vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score (scale 0-100)
Unit
scale 0-100
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
219 places, 4,336 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed

The data products overall score is a composite score measuring whether the country is able to produce relevant indicators, primarily related to SDGs. The data products (internal process) pillar is segmented by four topics and organized into (i) social, (ii) economic, (iii) environmental, and (iv) institutional dimensions using the typology of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This approach anchors the national statistical system's performance around the essential data required to support the achievement of the 2030 global goals, and enables comparisons across countries so that a global view can be generated while enabling country specific emphasis to reflect the user needs of that country.