Iraq vs Papua New Guinea: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score over time
- Iraq
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 66.53 scale 0-100 against 66.44 scale 0-100 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.09 scale 0-100.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.
Iraq ranks 136th and Papua New Guinea ranks 137th of 215 countries.
Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iraq | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 57.13 scale 0-100 | 52.72 scale 0-100 | 4.4 scale 0-100 | Iraq |
| 2010s | 59.33 scale 0-100 | 52.06 scale 0-100 | 7.26 scale 0-100 | Iraq |
| 2020s | 71.96 scale 0-100 | 67.73 scale 0-100 | 4.23 scale 0-100 | Iraq |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 3 data products score, Iraq or Papua New Guinea?
- Iraq, at 66.53 scale 0-100 against 66.44 scale 0-100 in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 3 data products score between Iraq and Papua New Guinea?
- 0.09 scale 0-100, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and Papua New Guinea?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
- How do Iraq and Papua New Guinea rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 3 data products score?
- Iraq ranks 136th and Papua New Guinea ranks 137th of 215 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The data products overall score is a composite score measuring whether the country is able to produce relevant indicators, primarily related to SDGs. The data products (internal process) pillar is segmented by four topics and organized into (i) social, (ii) economic, (iii) environmental, and (iv) institutional dimensions using the typology of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This approach anchors the national statistical system's performance around the essential data required to support the achievement of the 2030 global goals, and enables comparisons across countries so that a global view can be generated while enabling country specific emphasis to reflect the user needs of that country.