Madagascar, Republic of vs North Macedonia: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score

Madagascar, Republic of
73.47 scale 0-100
in 2024
North Macedonia
72.23 scale 0-100
in 2024
Madagascar, Republic of rank
106th
North Macedonia rank
109th

Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score over time

  • Madagascar, Republic of
  • North Macedonia
020406080200520142024

How they compare

Madagascar, Republic of currently reports 73.47 scale 0-100 against 72.23 scale 0-100 in North Macedonia, a difference of 1.24 scale 0-100.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Madagascar, Republic of ahead.

Madagascar, Republic of ranks 106th and North Macedonia ranks 109th of 215 countries.

Madagascar, Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Madagascar, Republic of North Macedonia Difference Ahead
2000s 63.08 scale 0-100 48.03 scale 0-100 15.05 scale 0-100 Madagascar, Republic of
2010s 62.73 scale 0-100 51.09 scale 0-100 11.63 scale 0-100 Madagascar, Republic of
2020s 73.62 scale 0-100 72.47 scale 0-100 1.15 scale 0-100 Madagascar, Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 3 data products score, Madagascar, Republic of or North Macedonia?
Madagascar, Republic of, at 73.47 scale 0-100 against 72.23 scale 0-100 in North Macedonia as of 2024.
What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 3 data products score between Madagascar, Republic of and North Macedonia?
1.24 scale 0-100, with Madagascar, Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Madagascar, Republic of and North Macedonia?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do Madagascar, Republic of and North Macedonia rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 3 data products score?
Madagascar, Republic of ranks 106th and North Macedonia ranks 109th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Madagascar, Republic of vs North Macedonia: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score. Statizoid, drawing on Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-3-data-products-score-scale-0-100/madagascar/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-3-data-products-score-scale-0-100/madagascar/north-macedonia/">Madagascar, Republic of vs North Macedonia: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score (scale 0-100)
Unit
scale 0-100
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
219 places, 4,336 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed

The data products overall score is a composite score measuring whether the country is able to produce relevant indicators, primarily related to SDGs. The data products (internal process) pillar is segmented by four topics and organized into (i) social, (ii) economic, (iii) environmental, and (iv) institutional dimensions using the typology of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This approach anchors the national statistical system's performance around the essential data required to support the achievement of the 2030 global goals, and enables comparisons across countries so that a global view can be generated while enabling country specific emphasis to reflect the user needs of that country.