North Macedonia vs Palestine, State of: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score

North Macedonia
72.23 scale 0-100
in 2024
Palestine, State of
71.47 scale 0-100
in 2024
North Macedonia rank
109th
Palestine, State of rank
112th

Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score over time

  • North Macedonia
  • Palestine, State of
020406080200520142024

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 72.23 scale 0-100 against 71.47 scale 0-100 in Palestine, State of, a difference of 0.76 scale 0-100.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Palestine, State of ahead.

North Macedonia ranks 109th and Palestine, State of ranks 112th of 215 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, North Macedonia averaged higher in 1 and Palestine, State of in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade North Macedonia Palestine, State of Difference Ahead
2000s 48.03 scale 0-100 53.01 scale 0-100 4.98 scale 0-100 Palestine, State of
2010s 51.09 scale 0-100 56.75 scale 0-100 5.66 scale 0-100 Palestine, State of
2020s 72.47 scale 0-100 70.12 scale 0-100 2.35 scale 0-100 North Macedonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 3 data products score, North Macedonia or Palestine, State of?
North Macedonia, at 72.23 scale 0-100 against 71.47 scale 0-100 in Palestine, State of as of 2024.
What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 3 data products score between North Macedonia and Palestine, State of?
0.76 scale 0-100, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Palestine, State of?
20 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2024.
How do North Macedonia and Palestine, State of rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 3 data products score?
North Macedonia ranks 109th and Palestine, State of ranks 112th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

North Macedonia vs Palestine, State of: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score. Statizoid, drawing on Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-3-data-products-score-scale-0-100/north-macedonia/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-3-data-products-score-scale-0-100/north-macedonia/west-bank-and-gaza/">North Macedonia vs Palestine, State of: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 3 data products score (scale 0-100)
Unit
scale 0-100
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
219 places, 4,336 data points, 2005–2024
Last refreshed

The data products overall score is a composite score measuring whether the country is able to produce relevant indicators, primarily related to SDGs. The data products (internal process) pillar is segmented by four topics and organized into (i) social, (ii) economic, (iii) environmental, and (iv) institutional dimensions using the typology of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This approach anchors the national statistical system's performance around the essential data required to support the achievement of the 2030 global goals, and enables comparisons across countries so that a global view can be generated while enabling country specific emphasis to reflect the user needs of that country.