Azerbaijan vs Sri Lanka: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score

Azerbaijan
66.33 scale 0-100
in 2024
Sri Lanka
64.07 scale 0-100
in 2024
Azerbaijan rank
78th
Sri Lanka rank
80th

Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score over time

  • Azerbaijan
  • Sri Lanka
020406080201520192024

How they compare

Azerbaijan currently reports 66.33 scale 0-100 against 64.07 scale 0-100 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 2.26 scale 0-100.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Azerbaijan ranks 78th and Sri Lanka ranks 80th of 182 countries.

Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
2010s 58.65 scale 0-100 78.45 scale 0-100 19.8 scale 0-100 Sri Lanka
2020s 63.44 scale 0-100 77.68 scale 0-100 14.24 scale 0-100 Sri Lanka

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score, Azerbaijan or Sri Lanka?
Azerbaijan, at 66.33 scale 0-100 against 64.07 scale 0-100 in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score between Azerbaijan and Sri Lanka?
2.26 scale 0-100, with Azerbaijan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan and Sri Lanka?
10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
How do Azerbaijan and Sri Lanka rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score?
Azerbaijan ranks 78th and Sri Lanka ranks 80th of 182 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Azerbaijan vs Sri Lanka: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score. Statizoid, drawing on Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-4-data-sources-score-scale-0-100/azerbaijan/sri-lanka/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-4-data-sources-score-scale-0-100/azerbaijan/sri-lanka/">Azerbaijan vs Sri Lanka: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score (scale 0-100)
Unit
scale 0-100
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
186 places, 1,766 data points, 2015–2024
Last refreshed

The data sources overall score is a composite measure of whether countries have data available from the following sources: Censuses and surveys, administrative data, geospatial data, and private sector/citizen generated data. The data sources (input) pillar is segmented by four types of sources generated by (i) the statistical office (censuses and surveys), and sources accessed from elsewhere such as (ii) administrative data, (iii) geospatial data, and (iv) private sector data and citizen generated data. The appropriate balance between these source types will vary depending on a country's institutional setting and the maturity of its statistical system. High scores should reflect the extent to which the sources being utilized enable the necessary statistical indicators to be generated. For example, a low score on environment statistics (in the data production pillar) may reflect a lack of use of (and low score for) geospatial data (in the data sources pillar). This type of linkage is inherent in the data cycle approach and can help highlight areas for investment required if country needs are to be met.