Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score

Bosnia and Herzegovina
53.42 scale 0-100
in 2024
Tanzania, United Republic of
52.95 scale 0-100
in 2024
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
107th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
110th

Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
0204060201520192024

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 53.42 scale 0-100 against 52.95 scale 0-100 in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.47 scale 0-100.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Bosnia and Herzegovina has been ahead every year.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 107th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 110th of 183 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
2010s 50.92 scale 0-100 41.38 scale 0-100 9.54 scale 0-100 Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 58.46 scale 0-100 50.13 scale 0-100 8.33 scale 0-100 Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 53.42 scale 0-100 against 52.95 scale 0-100 in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2024.
What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.47 scale 0-100, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Tanzania, United Republic of?
10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 107th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 110th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score. Statizoid, drawing on Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-4-data-sources-score-scale-0-100/bosnia-and-herzegovina/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-4-data-sources-score-scale-0-100/bosnia-and-herzegovina/tanzania/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score (scale 0-100)
Unit
scale 0-100
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
187 places, 1,776 data points, 2015–2024
Last refreshed

The data sources overall score is a composite measure of whether countries have data available from the following sources: Censuses and surveys, administrative data, geospatial data, and private sector/citizen generated data. The data sources (input) pillar is segmented by four types of sources generated by (i) the statistical office (censuses and surveys), and sources accessed from elsewhere such as (ii) administrative data, (iii) geospatial data, and (iv) private sector data and citizen generated data. The appropriate balance between these source types will vary depending on a country's institutional setting and the maturity of its statistical system. High scores should reflect the extent to which the sources being utilized enable the necessary statistical indicators to be generated. For example, a low score on environment statistics (in the data production pillar) may reflect a lack of use of (and low score for) geospatial data (in the data sources pillar). This type of linkage is inherent in the data cycle approach and can help highlight areas for investment required if country needs are to be met.