Brunei Darussalam vs Tanzania: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score over time
- Brunei Darussalam
- Tanzania
How they compare
Brunei Darussalam currently reports 53.39 scale 0-100 against 52.95 scale 0-100 in Tanzania, a difference of 0.44 scale 0-100.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2020 it was Brunei Darussalam ahead.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 108th and Tanzania ranks 110th of 182 countries.
Brunei Darussalam has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score, Brunei Darussalam or Tanzania?
- Brunei Darussalam, at 53.39 scale 0-100 against 52.95 scale 0-100 in Tanzania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score between Brunei Darussalam and Tanzania?
- 0.44 scale 0-100, with Brunei Darussalam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and Tanzania?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2020 to 2024.
- How do Brunei Darussalam and Tanzania rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 108th and Tanzania ranks 110th of 182 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The data sources overall score is a composite measure of whether countries have data available from the following sources: Censuses and surveys, administrative data, geospatial data, and private sector/citizen generated data. The data sources (input) pillar is segmented by four types of sources generated by (i) the statistical office (censuses and surveys), and sources accessed from elsewhere such as (ii) administrative data, (iii) geospatial data, and (iv) private sector data and citizen generated data. The appropriate balance between these source types will vary depending on a country's institutional setting and the maturity of its statistical system. High scores should reflect the extent to which the sources being utilized enable the necessary statistical indicators to be generated. For example, a low score on environment statistics (in the data production pillar) may reflect a lack of use of (and low score for) geospatial data (in the data sources pillar). This type of linkage is inherent in the data cycle approach and can help highlight areas for investment required if country needs are to be met.