Djibouti vs Papua New Guinea: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score

Djibouti
16.57 scale 0-100
in 2024
Papua New Guinea
14.47 scale 0-100
in 2024
Djibouti rank
177th
Papua New Guinea rank
178th

Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score over time

  • Djibouti
  • Papua New Guinea
05101520201520192024

How they compare

Djibouti currently reports 16.57 scale 0-100 against 14.47 scale 0-100 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 2.1 scale 0-100.

That makes Djibouti's figure about 1.1 times Papua New Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Djibouti ahead.

Djibouti ranks 177th and Papua New Guinea ranks 178th of 182 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Djibouti averaged higher in 1 and Papua New Guinea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Djibouti Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
2010s 16 scale 0-100 16.84 scale 0-100 0.845 scale 0-100 Papua New Guinea
2020s 15.23 scale 0-100 13.84 scale 0-100 1.38 scale 0-100 Djibouti

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score, Djibouti or Papua New Guinea?
Djibouti, at 16.57 scale 0-100 against 14.47 scale 0-100 in Papua New Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score between Djibouti and Papua New Guinea?
2.1 scale 0-100, with Djibouti ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Papua New Guinea?
10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
How do Djibouti and Papua New Guinea rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score?
Djibouti ranks 177th and Papua New Guinea ranks 178th of 182 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Djibouti vs Papua New Guinea: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score. Statizoid, drawing on Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-4-data-sources-score-scale-0-100/djibouti/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-4-data-sources-score-scale-0-100/djibouti/papua-new-guinea/">Djibouti vs Papua New Guinea: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score (scale 0-100)
Unit
scale 0-100
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
186 places, 1,766 data points, 2015–2024
Last refreshed

The data sources overall score is a composite measure of whether countries have data available from the following sources: Censuses and surveys, administrative data, geospatial data, and private sector/citizen generated data. The data sources (input) pillar is segmented by four types of sources generated by (i) the statistical office (censuses and surveys), and sources accessed from elsewhere such as (ii) administrative data, (iii) geospatial data, and (iv) private sector data and citizen generated data. The appropriate balance between these source types will vary depending on a country's institutional setting and the maturity of its statistical system. High scores should reflect the extent to which the sources being utilized enable the necessary statistical indicators to be generated. For example, a low score on environment statistics (in the data production pillar) may reflect a lack of use of (and low score for) geospatial data (in the data sources pillar). This type of linkage is inherent in the data cycle approach and can help highlight areas for investment required if country needs are to be met.