India vs Palestine, State of: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score

India
74.18 scale 0-100
in 2024
Palestine, State of
73.2 scale 0-100
in 2024
India rank
54th
Palestine, State of rank
56th

Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score over time

  • India
  • Palestine, State of
020406080201520192024

How they compare

India currently reports 74.18 scale 0-100 against 73.2 scale 0-100 in Palestine, State of, a difference of 0.98 scale 0-100.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was India ahead.

India ranks 54th and Palestine, State of ranks 56th of 182 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, India averaged higher in 1 and Palestine, State of in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade India Palestine, State of Difference Ahead
2010s 55.19 scale 0-100 56.88 scale 0-100 1.69 scale 0-100 Palestine, State of
2020s 73.65 scale 0-100 68.82 scale 0-100 4.83 scale 0-100 India

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score, India or Palestine, State of?
India, at 74.18 scale 0-100 against 73.2 scale 0-100 in Palestine, State of as of 2024.
What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score between India and Palestine, State of?
0.98 scale 0-100, with India ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and Palestine, State of?
10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
How do India and Palestine, State of rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score?
India ranks 54th and Palestine, State of ranks 56th of 182 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

India vs Palestine, State of: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score. Statizoid, drawing on Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-4-data-sources-score-scale-0-100/india/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-4-data-sources-score-scale-0-100/india/west-bank-and-gaza/">India vs Palestine, State of: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score (scale 0-100)
Unit
scale 0-100
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
186 places, 1,766 data points, 2015–2024
Last refreshed

The data sources overall score is a composite measure of whether countries have data available from the following sources: Censuses and surveys, administrative data, geospatial data, and private sector/citizen generated data. The data sources (input) pillar is segmented by four types of sources generated by (i) the statistical office (censuses and surveys), and sources accessed from elsewhere such as (ii) administrative data, (iii) geospatial data, and (iv) private sector data and citizen generated data. The appropriate balance between these source types will vary depending on a country's institutional setting and the maturity of its statistical system. High scores should reflect the extent to which the sources being utilized enable the necessary statistical indicators to be generated. For example, a low score on environment statistics (in the data production pillar) may reflect a lack of use of (and low score for) geospatial data (in the data sources pillar). This type of linkage is inherent in the data cycle approach and can help highlight areas for investment required if country needs are to be met.