Libya vs South Sudan: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score over time
- Libya
- South Sudan
How they compare
Libya currently reports 10.67 scale 0-100 against 9.74 scale 0-100 in South Sudan, a difference of 0.93 scale 0-100.
That makes Libya's figure about 1.1 times South Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2016 it was South Sudan ahead.
Libya ranks 180th and South Sudan ranks 181st of 181 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and South Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 16.48 scale 0-100 | 21.39 scale 0-100 | 4.9 scale 0-100 | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 10.31 scale 0-100 | 9.22 scale 0-100 | 1.09 scale 0-100 | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score, Libya or South Sudan?
- Libya, at 10.67 scale 0-100 against 9.74 scale 0-100 in South Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score between Libya and South Sudan?
- 0.93 scale 0-100, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and South Sudan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
- How do Libya and South Sudan rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score?
- Libya ranks 180th and South Sudan ranks 181st of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The data sources overall score is a composite measure of whether countries have data available from the following sources: Censuses and surveys, administrative data, geospatial data, and private sector/citizen generated data. The data sources (input) pillar is segmented by four types of sources generated by (i) the statistical office (censuses and surveys), and sources accessed from elsewhere such as (ii) administrative data, (iii) geospatial data, and (iv) private sector data and citizen generated data. The appropriate balance between these source types will vary depending on a country's institutional setting and the maturity of its statistical system. High scores should reflect the extent to which the sources being utilized enable the necessary statistical indicators to be generated. For example, a low score on environment statistics (in the data production pillar) may reflect a lack of use of (and low score for) geospatial data (in the data sources pillar). This type of linkage is inherent in the data cycle approach and can help highlight areas for investment required if country needs are to be met.