Malawi vs Samoa: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score over time
- Malawi
- Samoa
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 50.64 scale 0-100 against 49.38 scale 0-100 in Malawi, a difference of 1.26 scale 0-100.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Malawi ahead.
Malawi ranks 114th and Samoa ranks 112th of 181 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Samoa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 44.94 scale 0-100 | 34.18 scale 0-100 | 10.76 scale 0-100 | Malawi |
| 2020s | 48.82 scale 0-100 | 46.32 scale 0-100 | 2.5 scale 0-100 | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score, Malawi or Samoa?
- Samoa, at 50.64 scale 0-100 against 49.38 scale 0-100 in Malawi as of 2024.
- What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score between Malawi and Samoa?
- 1.26 scale 0-100, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Samoa?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
- How do Malawi and Samoa rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score?
- Malawi ranks 114th and Samoa ranks 112th of 181 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The data sources overall score is a composite measure of whether countries have data available from the following sources: Censuses and surveys, administrative data, geospatial data, and private sector/citizen generated data. The data sources (input) pillar is segmented by four types of sources generated by (i) the statistical office (censuses and surveys), and sources accessed from elsewhere such as (ii) administrative data, (iii) geospatial data, and (iv) private sector data and citizen generated data. The appropriate balance between these source types will vary depending on a country's institutional setting and the maturity of its statistical system. High scores should reflect the extent to which the sources being utilized enable the necessary statistical indicators to be generated. For example, a low score on environment statistics (in the data production pillar) may reflect a lack of use of (and low score for) geospatial data (in the data sources pillar). This type of linkage is inherent in the data cycle approach and can help highlight areas for investment required if country needs are to be met.