Malaysia vs North Macedonia: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score

Malaysia
80.16 scale 0-100
in 2024
North Macedonia
80.4 scale 0-100
in 2024
Malaysia rank
37th
North Macedonia rank
34th

Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score over time

  • Malaysia
  • North Macedonia
020406080201520192024

How they compare

North Macedonia currently reports 80.4 scale 0-100 against 80.16 scale 0-100 in Malaysia, a difference of 0.24 scale 0-100.

Across all 10 years both countries report, North Macedonia has been ahead every year.

Malaysia ranks 37th and North Macedonia ranks 34th of 182 countries.

North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malaysia North Macedonia Difference Ahead
2010s 57.03 scale 0-100 61.77 scale 0-100 4.74 scale 0-100 North Macedonia
2020s 71.1 scale 0-100 74.75 scale 0-100 3.65 scale 0-100 North Macedonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score, Malaysia or North Macedonia?
North Macedonia, at 80.4 scale 0-100 against 80.16 scale 0-100 in Malaysia as of 2024.
What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score between Malaysia and North Macedonia?
0.24 scale 0-100, with North Macedonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and North Macedonia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
How do Malaysia and North Macedonia rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score?
Malaysia ranks 37th and North Macedonia ranks 34th of 182 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malaysia vs North Macedonia: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score. Statizoid, drawing on Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-4-data-sources-score-scale-0-100/malaysia/north-macedonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-4-data-sources-score-scale-0-100/malaysia/north-macedonia/">Malaysia vs North Macedonia: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score (scale 0-100)
Unit
scale 0-100
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
186 places, 1,766 data points, 2015–2024
Last refreshed

The data sources overall score is a composite measure of whether countries have data available from the following sources: Censuses and surveys, administrative data, geospatial data, and private sector/citizen generated data. The data sources (input) pillar is segmented by four types of sources generated by (i) the statistical office (censuses and surveys), and sources accessed from elsewhere such as (ii) administrative data, (iii) geospatial data, and (iv) private sector data and citizen generated data. The appropriate balance between these source types will vary depending on a country's institutional setting and the maturity of its statistical system. High scores should reflect the extent to which the sources being utilized enable the necessary statistical indicators to be generated. For example, a low score on environment statistics (in the data production pillar) may reflect a lack of use of (and low score for) geospatial data (in the data sources pillar). This type of linkage is inherent in the data cycle approach and can help highlight areas for investment required if country needs are to be met.