Mauritius vs Thailand: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score

Mauritius
67.33 scale 0-100
in 2024
Thailand
67.53 scale 0-100
in 2024
Mauritius rank
75th
Thailand rank
74th

Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score over time

  • Mauritius
  • Thailand
0204060201520192024

How they compare

Thailand currently reports 67.53 scale 0-100 against 67.33 scale 0-100 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.2 scale 0-100.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Mauritius ahead.

Mauritius ranks 75th and Thailand ranks 74th of 183 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and Thailand in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Thailand Difference Ahead
2010s 61.67 scale 0-100 57.05 scale 0-100 4.62 scale 0-100 Mauritius
2020s 64.46 scale 0-100 64.89 scale 0-100 0.4333 scale 0-100 Thailand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score, Mauritius or Thailand?
Thailand, at 67.53 scale 0-100 against 67.33 scale 0-100 in Mauritius as of 2024.
What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score between Mauritius and Thailand?
0.2 scale 0-100, with Thailand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Thailand?
10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
How do Mauritius and Thailand rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score?
Mauritius ranks 75th and Thailand ranks 74th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Thailand: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score. Statizoid, drawing on Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-4-data-sources-score-scale-0-100/mauritius/thailand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-4-data-sources-score-scale-0-100/mauritius/thailand/">Mauritius vs Thailand: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score (scale 0-100)
Unit
scale 0-100
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
187 places, 1,776 data points, 2015–2024
Last refreshed

The data sources overall score is a composite measure of whether countries have data available from the following sources: Censuses and surveys, administrative data, geospatial data, and private sector/citizen generated data. The data sources (input) pillar is segmented by four types of sources generated by (i) the statistical office (censuses and surveys), and sources accessed from elsewhere such as (ii) administrative data, (iii) geospatial data, and (iv) private sector data and citizen generated data. The appropriate balance between these source types will vary depending on a country's institutional setting and the maturity of its statistical system. High scores should reflect the extent to which the sources being utilized enable the necessary statistical indicators to be generated. For example, a low score on environment statistics (in the data production pillar) may reflect a lack of use of (and low score for) geospatial data (in the data sources pillar). This type of linkage is inherent in the data cycle approach and can help highlight areas for investment required if country needs are to be met.