Singapore vs Upper middle income: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score

Singapore
95.88 scale 0-100
in 2024
Upper middle income
59.56 scale 0-100
in 2024
Singapore rank
1st
Upper middle income rank
2nd

Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score over time

  • Singapore
  • Upper middle income
020406080100201620202024

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 95.88 scale 0-100 against 59.56 scale 0-100 in Upper middle income, a difference of 36.32 scale 0-100.

That makes Singapore's figure about 1.6 times Upper middle income's.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

Singapore ranks 1st and Upper middle income ranks 2nd of 182 countries.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Singapore Upper middle income Difference Ahead
2010s 68.64 scale 0-100 52.13 scale 0-100 16.5 scale 0-100 Singapore
2020s 89.8 scale 0-100 57.81 scale 0-100 31.99 scale 0-100 Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score, Singapore or Upper middle income?
Singapore, at 95.88 scale 0-100 against 59.56 scale 0-100 in Upper middle income as of 2024.
What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score between Singapore and Upper middle income?
36.32 scale 0-100, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Singapore and Upper middle income?
9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
How do Singapore and Upper middle income rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score?
Singapore ranks 1st and Upper middle income ranks 2nd of 182 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Singapore vs Upper middle income: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score. Statizoid, drawing on Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-4-data-sources-score-scale-0-100/singapore/upper-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-4-data-sources-score-scale-0-100/singapore/upper-middle-income/">Singapore vs Upper middle income: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score (scale 0-100)
Unit
scale 0-100
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
186 places, 1,766 data points, 2015–2024
Last refreshed

The data sources overall score is a composite measure of whether countries have data available from the following sources: Censuses and surveys, administrative data, geospatial data, and private sector/citizen generated data. The data sources (input) pillar is segmented by four types of sources generated by (i) the statistical office (censuses and surveys), and sources accessed from elsewhere such as (ii) administrative data, (iii) geospatial data, and (iv) private sector data and citizen generated data. The appropriate balance between these source types will vary depending on a country's institutional setting and the maturity of its statistical system. High scores should reflect the extent to which the sources being utilized enable the necessary statistical indicators to be generated. For example, a low score on environment statistics (in the data production pillar) may reflect a lack of use of (and low score for) geospatial data (in the data sources pillar). This type of linkage is inherent in the data cycle approach and can help highlight areas for investment required if country needs are to be met.