South Sudan vs Syrian Arab Republic: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score

South Sudan
9.74 scale 0-100
in 2024
Syrian Arab Republic
11.17 scale 0-100
in 2024
South Sudan rank
182nd
Syrian Arab Republic rank
180th

Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score over time

  • South Sudan
  • Syrian Arab Republic
510152025201520192024

How they compare

Syrian Arab Republic currently reports 11.17 scale 0-100 against 9.74 scale 0-100 in South Sudan, a difference of 1.43 scale 0-100.

That makes Syrian Arab Republic's figure about 1.1 times South Sudan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2017 it was South Sudan ahead.

South Sudan ranks 182nd and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 180th of 182 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, South Sudan averaged higher in 1 and Syrian Arab Republic in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Sudan Syrian Arab Republic Difference Ahead
2010s 20.65 scale 0-100 17.4 scale 0-100 3.25 scale 0-100 South Sudan
2020s 9.22 scale 0-100 12.33 scale 0-100 3.11 scale 0-100 Syrian Arab Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score, South Sudan or Syrian Arab Republic?
Syrian Arab Republic, at 11.17 scale 0-100 against 9.74 scale 0-100 in South Sudan as of 2024.
What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score between South Sudan and Syrian Arab Republic?
1.43 scale 0-100, with Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Syrian Arab Republic?
8 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2024.
How do South Sudan and Syrian Arab Republic rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score?
South Sudan ranks 182nd and Syrian Arab Republic ranks 180th of 182 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Sudan vs Syrian Arab Republic: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score. Statizoid, drawing on Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-4-data-sources-score-scale-0-100/south-sudan/syrian-arab-republic/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-4-data-sources-score-scale-0-100/south-sudan/syrian-arab-republic/">South Sudan vs Syrian Arab Republic: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score (scale 0-100)
Unit
scale 0-100
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
186 places, 1,766 data points, 2015–2024
Last refreshed

The data sources overall score is a composite measure of whether countries have data available from the following sources: Censuses and surveys, administrative data, geospatial data, and private sector/citizen generated data. The data sources (input) pillar is segmented by four types of sources generated by (i) the statistical office (censuses and surveys), and sources accessed from elsewhere such as (ii) administrative data, (iii) geospatial data, and (iv) private sector data and citizen generated data. The appropriate balance between these source types will vary depending on a country's institutional setting and the maturity of its statistical system. High scores should reflect the extent to which the sources being utilized enable the necessary statistical indicators to be generated. For example, a low score on environment statistics (in the data production pillar) may reflect a lack of use of (and low score for) geospatial data (in the data sources pillar). This type of linkage is inherent in the data cycle approach and can help highlight areas for investment required if country needs are to be met.