Turkey vs Palestine: Statistical performance: Pillar 4 data sources score (scale)

Turkey
71.99 scale 0-100
in 2024
Palestine
73.2 scale 0-100
in 2024
Turkey rank
58th
Palestine rank
56th

Statistical performance: Pillar 4 data sources score (scale) over time

  • Turkey
  • Palestine
020406080201520192024

How they compare

Palestine currently reports 73.2 scale 0-100 against 71.99 scale 0-100 in Turkey, a difference of 1.21 scale 0-100.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Turkey ahead.

Turkey ranks 58th and Palestine ranks 56th of 183 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Turkey averaged higher in 1 and Palestine in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Turkey Palestine Difference Ahead
2010s 63.9 scale 0-100 56.88 scale 0-100 7.02 scale 0-100 Turkey
2020s 67.36 scale 0-100 68.82 scale 0-100 1.46 scale 0-100 Palestine

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score, Turkey or Palestine?
Palestine, at 73.2 scale 0-100 against 71.99 scale 0-100 in Turkey as of 2024.
What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score between Turkey and Palestine?
1.21 scale 0-100, with Palestine ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Turkey and Palestine?
10 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2024.
How do Turkey and Palestine rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 4 data sources score?
Turkey ranks 58th and Palestine ranks 56th of 183 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Turkey vs Palestine: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score. Statizoid, drawing on Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 08 November 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-4-data-sources-score-scale-0-100/turkiye/west-bank-and-gaza/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-4-data-sources-score-scale-0-100/turkiye/west-bank-and-gaza/">Turkey vs Palestine: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 4 data sources score (scale 0-100)
Unit
scale 0-100
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
187 places, 1,776 data points, 2015–2024
Last refreshed

The data sources overall score is a composite measure of whether countries have data available from the following sources: Censuses and surveys, administrative data, geospatial data, and private sector/citizen generated data. The data sources (input) pillar is segmented by four types of sources generated by (i) the statistical office (censuses and surveys), and sources accessed from elsewhere such as (ii) administrative data, (iii) geospatial data, and (iv) private sector data and citizen generated data. The appropriate balance between these source types will vary depending on a country's institutional setting and the maturity of its statistical system. High scores should reflect the extent to which the sources being utilized enable the necessary statistical indicators to be generated. For example, a low score on environment statistics (in the data production pillar) may reflect a lack of use of (and low score for) geospatial data (in the data sources pillar). This type of linkage is inherent in the data cycle approach and can help highlight areas for investment required if country needs are to be met.