Barbados vs Myanmar: Statistical performance: Pillar 5 data infrastructure score
Statistical performance: Pillar 5 data infrastructure score over time
- Barbados
- Myanmar
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 60 scale 0-100 against 60 scale 0-100 in Myanmar, a difference of 0 scale 0-100.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Myanmar ahead.
Barbados ranks 102nd and Myanmar ranks 102nd of 192 countries.
Myanmar has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 26.25 scale 0-100 | 33.75 scale 0-100 | 7.5 scale 0-100 | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 54 scale 0-100 | 55 scale 0-100 | 1 scale 0-100 | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data, Barbados or Myanmar?
- Barbados, at 60 scale 0-100 against 60 scale 0-100 in Myanmar as of 2024.
- What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data between Barbados and Myanmar?
- 0 scale 0-100, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Myanmar?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
- How do Barbados and Myanmar rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data?
- Barbados ranks 102nd and Myanmar ranks 102nd of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The data infrastructure pillar overall score measures the hard and soft infrastructure segments, itemizing essential cross cutting requirements for an effective statistical system. The segments are: (i) legislation and governance covering the existence of laws and a functioning institutional framework for the statistical system; (ii) standards and methods addressing compliance with recognized frameworks and concepts; (iii) skills including level of skills within the statistical system and among users (statistical literacy); (iv) partnerships reflecting the need for the statistical system to be inclusive and coherent; and (v) finance mobilized both domestically and from donors.