Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Senegal: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Senegal
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 80 scale 0-100 against 80 scale 0-100 in Senegal, a difference of 0 scale 0-100.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 50th and Senegal ranks 50th of 191 countries.
Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 62.5 scale 0-100 | 40 scale 0-100 | 22.5 scale 0-100 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2020s | 75 scale 0-100 | 74 scale 0-100 | 1 scale 0-100 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Senegal?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 80 scale 0-100 against 80 scale 0-100 in Senegal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Senegal?
- 0 scale 0-100, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Senegal?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Senegal rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 50th and Senegal ranks 50th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The data infrastructure pillar overall score measures the hard and soft infrastructure segments, itemizing essential cross cutting requirements for an effective statistical system. The segments are: (i) legislation and governance covering the existence of laws and a functioning institutional framework for the statistical system; (ii) standards and methods addressing compliance with recognized frameworks and concepts; (iii) skills including level of skills within the statistical system and among users (statistical literacy); (iv) partnerships reflecting the need for the statistical system to be inclusive and coherent; and (v) finance mobilized both domestically and from donors.