Central African Republic vs Grenada: Statistical performance: Pillar 5 data infrastructure score
Statistical performance: Pillar 5 data infrastructure score over time
- Central African Republic
- Grenada
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 40 scale 0-100 against 40 scale 0-100 in Grenada, a difference of 0 scale 0-100.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Grenada ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 162nd and Grenada ranks 162nd of 192 countries.
Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 16.25 scale 0-100 | 23.75 scale 0-100 | 7.5 scale 0-100 | Grenada |
| 2020s | 31 scale 0-100 | 32 scale 0-100 | 1 scale 0-100 | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data, Central African Republic or Grenada?
- Central African Republic, at 40 scale 0-100 against 40 scale 0-100 in Grenada as of 2024.
- What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data between Central African Republic and Grenada?
- 0 scale 0-100, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Grenada?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
- How do Central African Republic and Grenada rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data?
- Central African Republic ranks 162nd and Grenada ranks 162nd of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The data infrastructure pillar overall score measures the hard and soft infrastructure segments, itemizing essential cross cutting requirements for an effective statistical system. The segments are: (i) legislation and governance covering the existence of laws and a functioning institutional framework for the statistical system; (ii) standards and methods addressing compliance with recognized frameworks and concepts; (iii) skills including level of skills within the statistical system and among users (statistical literacy); (iv) partnerships reflecting the need for the statistical system to be inclusive and coherent; and (v) finance mobilized both domestically and from donors.