Comoros, Union of the vs St. Vincent and the Grenadines: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure

Comoros, Union of the
40 scale 0-100
in 2024
St. Vincent and the Grenadines
40 scale 0-100
in 2024
Comoros, Union of the rank
161st
St. Vincent and the Grenadines rank
161st

Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure over time

  • Comoros, Union of the
  • St. Vincent and the Grenadines
010203040201620202024

How they compare

Comoros, Union of the currently reports 40 scale 0-100 against 40 scale 0-100 in St. Vincent and the Grenadines, a difference of 0 scale 0-100.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2016 it was St. Vincent and the Grenadines ahead.

Comoros, Union of the ranks 161st and St. Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 161st of 191 countries.

St. Vincent and the Grenadines has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Comoros, Union of the St. Vincent and the Grenadines Difference Ahead
2010s 23.75 scale 0-100 36.25 scale 0-100 12.5 scale 0-100 St. Vincent and the Grenadines
2020s 38 scale 0-100 38 scale 0-100 0 scale 0-100 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data infrastructure, Comoros, Union of the or St. Vincent and the Grenadines?
Comoros, Union of the, at 40 scale 0-100 against 40 scale 0-100 in St. Vincent and the Grenadines as of 2024.
What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data infrastructure between Comoros, Union of the and St. Vincent and the Grenadines?
0 scale 0-100, with Comoros, Union of the ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros, Union of the and St. Vincent and the Grenadines?
9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
How do Comoros, Union of the and St. Vincent and the Grenadines rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data infrastructure?
Comoros, Union of the ranks 161st and St. Vincent and the Grenadines ranks 161st of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Comoros, Union of the vs St. Vincent and the Grenadines: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure. Statizoid, drawing on Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-5-data-infrastructure-score-scale-0-100/comoros/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-5-data-infrastructure-score-scale-0-100/comoros/st-vincent-and-the-grenadines/">Comoros, Union of the vs St. Vincent and the Grenadines: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure</a> β€” Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure score (scale 0-100)
Unit
scale 0-100
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
195 places, 1,746 data points, 2016–2024
Last refreshed

The data infrastructure pillar overall score measures the hard and soft infrastructure segments, itemizing essential cross cutting requirements for an effective statistical system. The segments are: (i) legislation and governance covering the existence of laws and a functioning institutional framework for the statistical system; (ii) standards and methods addressing compliance with recognized frameworks and concepts; (iii) skills including level of skills within the statistical system and among users (statistical literacy); (iv) partnerships reflecting the need for the statistical system to be inclusive and coherent; and (v) finance mobilized both domestically and from donors.