Côte d'Ivoire vs Jordan: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Jordan
How they compare
Côte d'Ivoire currently reports 70 scale 0-100 against 70 scale 0-100 in Jordan, a difference of 0 scale 0-100.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Jordan ahead.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 77th and Jordan ranks 77th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Côte d'Ivoire averaged higher in 1 and Jordan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 23.75 scale 0-100 | 21.25 scale 0-100 | 2.5 scale 0-100 | Côte d'Ivoire |
| 2020s | 61 scale 0-100 | 67 scale 0-100 | 6 scale 0-100 | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data infrastructure, Côte d'Ivoire or Jordan?
- Côte d'Ivoire, at 70 scale 0-100 against 70 scale 0-100 in Jordan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data infrastructure between Côte d'Ivoire and Jordan?
- 0 scale 0-100, with Côte d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Jordan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Jordan rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data infrastructure?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 77th and Jordan ranks 77th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The data infrastructure pillar overall score measures the hard and soft infrastructure segments, itemizing essential cross cutting requirements for an effective statistical system. The segments are: (i) legislation and governance covering the existence of laws and a functioning institutional framework for the statistical system; (ii) standards and methods addressing compliance with recognized frameworks and concepts; (iii) skills including level of skills within the statistical system and among users (statistical literacy); (iv) partnerships reflecting the need for the statistical system to be inclusive and coherent; and (v) finance mobilized both domestically and from donors.