Djibouti vs Mali: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure over time
- Djibouti
- Mali
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 50 scale 0-100 against 50 scale 0-100 in Mali, a difference of 0 scale 0-100.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Mali ahead.
Djibouti ranks 137th and Mali ranks 137th of 191 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Djibouti averaged higher in 1 and Mali in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 16.25 scale 0-100 | 25 scale 0-100 | 8.75 scale 0-100 | Mali |
| 2020s | 44 scale 0-100 | 43 scale 0-100 | 1 scale 0-100 | Djibouti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data infrastructure, Djibouti or Mali?
- Djibouti, at 50 scale 0-100 against 50 scale 0-100 in Mali as of 2024.
- What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data infrastructure between Djibouti and Mali?
- 0 scale 0-100, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Mali?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
- How do Djibouti and Mali rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data infrastructure?
- Djibouti ranks 137th and Mali ranks 137th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The data infrastructure pillar overall score measures the hard and soft infrastructure segments, itemizing essential cross cutting requirements for an effective statistical system. The segments are: (i) legislation and governance covering the existence of laws and a functioning institutional framework for the statistical system; (ii) standards and methods addressing compliance with recognized frameworks and concepts; (iii) skills including level of skills within the statistical system and among users (statistical literacy); (iv) partnerships reflecting the need for the statistical system to be inclusive and coherent; and (v) finance mobilized both domestically and from donors.