Guinea-Bissau vs Nepal: Statistical performance: Pillar 5 data infrastructure score
Statistical performance: Pillar 5 data infrastructure score over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Nepal
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 50 scale 0-100 against 50 scale 0-100 in Nepal, a difference of 0 scale 0-100.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Nepal has been ahead every year.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 138th and Nepal ranks 138th of 192 countries.
Nepal has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 17.5 scale 0-100 | 21.25 scale 0-100 | 3.75 scale 0-100 | Nepal |
| 2020s | 29 scale 0-100 | 45 scale 0-100 | 16 scale 0-100 | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data, Guinea-Bissau or Nepal?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 50 scale 0-100 against 50 scale 0-100 in Nepal as of 2024.
- What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data between Guinea-Bissau and Nepal?
- 0 scale 0-100, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Nepal?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Nepal rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 138th and Nepal ranks 138th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The data infrastructure pillar overall score measures the hard and soft infrastructure segments, itemizing essential cross cutting requirements for an effective statistical system. The segments are: (i) legislation and governance covering the existence of laws and a functioning institutional framework for the statistical system; (ii) standards and methods addressing compliance with recognized frameworks and concepts; (iii) skills including level of skills within the statistical system and among users (statistical literacy); (iv) partnerships reflecting the need for the statistical system to be inclusive and coherent; and (v) finance mobilized both domestically and from donors.