Japan vs North Macedonia: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure over time
- Japan
- North Macedonia
How they compare
Japan currently reports 95 scale 0-100 against 95 scale 0-100 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0 scale 0-100.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Japan ahead.
Japan ranks 6th and North Macedonia ranks 6th of 191 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Japan | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 92.5 scale 0-100 | 56.25 scale 0-100 | 36.25 scale 0-100 | Japan |
| 2020s | 95 scale 0-100 | 81 scale 0-100 | 14 scale 0-100 | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data infrastructure, Japan or North Macedonia?
- Japan, at 95 scale 0-100 against 95 scale 0-100 in North Macedonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data infrastructure between Japan and North Macedonia?
- 0 scale 0-100, with Japan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and North Macedonia?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
- How do Japan and North Macedonia rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data infrastructure?
- Japan ranks 6th and North Macedonia ranks 6th of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The data infrastructure pillar overall score measures the hard and soft infrastructure segments, itemizing essential cross cutting requirements for an effective statistical system. The segments are: (i) legislation and governance covering the existence of laws and a functioning institutional framework for the statistical system; (ii) standards and methods addressing compliance with recognized frameworks and concepts; (iii) skills including level of skills within the statistical system and among users (statistical literacy); (iv) partnerships reflecting the need for the statistical system to be inclusive and coherent; and (v) finance mobilized both domestically and from donors.