Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure

Lao People's Democratic Republic
35 scale 0-100
in 2024
Saint Kitts and Nevis
35 scale 0-100
in 2024
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
173rd
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
173rd

Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure over time

  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
10203040201620202024

How they compare

Lao People's Democratic Republic currently reports 35 scale 0-100 against 35 scale 0-100 in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0 scale 0-100.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 173rd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 173rd of 191 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Lao People's Democratic Republic averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lao People's Democratic Republic Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
2010s 18.75 scale 0-100 22.5 scale 0-100 3.75 scale 0-100 Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 38 scale 0-100 32 scale 0-100 6 scale 0-100 Lao People's Democratic Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data infrastructure, Lao People's Democratic Republic or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Lao People's Democratic Republic, at 35 scale 0-100 against 35 scale 0-100 in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2024.
What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data infrastructure between Lao People's Democratic Republic and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0 scale 0-100, with Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data infrastructure?
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 173rd and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 173rd of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure. Statizoid, drawing on Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-5-data-infrastructure-score-scale-0-100/lao-pdr/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-5-data-infrastructure-score-scale-0-100/lao-pdr/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure score (scale 0-100)
Unit
scale 0-100
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
195 places, 1,746 data points, 2016–2024
Last refreshed

The data infrastructure pillar overall score measures the hard and soft infrastructure segments, itemizing essential cross cutting requirements for an effective statistical system. The segments are: (i) legislation and governance covering the existence of laws and a functioning institutional framework for the statistical system; (ii) standards and methods addressing compliance with recognized frameworks and concepts; (iii) skills including level of skills within the statistical system and among users (statistical literacy); (iv) partnerships reflecting the need for the statistical system to be inclusive and coherent; and (v) finance mobilized both domestically and from donors.