Mauritius vs Poland: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure over time
- Mauritius
- Poland
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 80 scale 0-100 against 80 scale 0-100 in Poland, a difference of 0 scale 0-100.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Mauritius ranks 50th and Poland ranks 50th of 190 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 68.75 scale 0-100 | 98.75 scale 0-100 | 30 scale 0-100 | Poland |
| 2020s | 73 scale 0-100 | 96 scale 0-100 | 23 scale 0-100 | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data infrastructure, Mauritius or Poland?
- Mauritius, at 80 scale 0-100 against 80 scale 0-100 in Poland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data infrastructure between Mauritius and Poland?
- 0 scale 0-100, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Poland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
- How do Mauritius and Poland rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data infrastructure?
- Mauritius ranks 50th and Poland ranks 50th of 190 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The data infrastructure pillar overall score measures the hard and soft infrastructure segments, itemizing essential cross cutting requirements for an effective statistical system. The segments are: (i) legislation and governance covering the existence of laws and a functioning institutional framework for the statistical system; (ii) standards and methods addressing compliance with recognized frameworks and concepts; (iii) skills including level of skills within the statistical system and among users (statistical literacy); (iv) partnerships reflecting the need for the statistical system to be inclusive and coherent; and (v) finance mobilized both domestically and from donors.