Namibia vs Qatar: Statistical performance: Pillar 5 data infrastructure score
Statistical performance: Pillar 5 data infrastructure score over time
- Namibia
- Qatar
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 65 scale 0-100 against 65 scale 0-100 in Qatar, a difference of 0 scale 0-100.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Qatar ahead.
Namibia ranks 93rd and Qatar ranks 93rd of 192 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 1 and Qatar in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Qatar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 30 scale 0-100 | 27.5 scale 0-100 | 2.5 scale 0-100 | Namibia |
| 2020s | 52 scale 0-100 | 57 scale 0-100 | 5 scale 0-100 | Qatar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data, Namibia or Qatar?
- Namibia, at 65 scale 0-100 against 65 scale 0-100 in Qatar as of 2024.
- What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data between Namibia and Qatar?
- 0 scale 0-100, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Qatar?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
- How do Namibia and Qatar rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data?
- Namibia ranks 93rd and Qatar ranks 93rd of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The data infrastructure pillar overall score measures the hard and soft infrastructure segments, itemizing essential cross cutting requirements for an effective statistical system. The segments are: (i) legislation and governance covering the existence of laws and a functioning institutional framework for the statistical system; (ii) standards and methods addressing compliance with recognized frameworks and concepts; (iii) skills including level of skills within the statistical system and among users (statistical literacy); (iv) partnerships reflecting the need for the statistical system to be inclusive and coherent; and (v) finance mobilized both domestically and from donors.