Russian Federation vs Upper middle income: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure

Russian Federation
100 scale 0-100
in 2024
Upper middle income
66.63 scale 0-100
in 2024
Russian Federation rank
1st
Upper middle income rank
2nd

Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure over time

  • Russian Federation
  • Upper middle income
020406080100201620202024

How they compare

Russian Federation currently reports 100 scale 0-100 against 66.63 scale 0-100 in Upper middle income, a difference of 33.37 scale 0-100.

That makes Russian Federation's figure about 1.5 times Upper middle income's.

Across all 9 years both countries report, Russian Federation has been ahead every year.

Russian Federation ranks 1st and Upper middle income ranks 2nd of 191 countries.

Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Russian Federation Upper middle income Difference Ahead
2010s 81.25 scale 0-100 48.03 scale 0-100 33.22 scale 0-100 Russian Federation
2020s 92 scale 0-100 61.36 scale 0-100 30.64 scale 0-100 Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data infrastructure, Russian Federation or Upper middle income?
Russian Federation, at 100 scale 0-100 against 66.63 scale 0-100 in Upper middle income as of 2024.
What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data infrastructure between Russian Federation and Upper middle income?
33.37 scale 0-100, with Russian Federation ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Upper middle income?
9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
How do Russian Federation and Upper middle income rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data infrastructure?
Russian Federation ranks 1st and Upper middle income ranks 2nd of 191 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Russian Federation vs Upper middle income: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure. Statizoid, drawing on Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB). Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-5-data-infrastructure-score-scale-0-100/russian-federation/upper-middle-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/statistical-performance-indicators-spi-pillar-5-data-infrastructure-score-scale-0-100/russian-federation/upper-middle-income/">Russian Federation vs Upper middle income: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure score (scale 0-100)
Unit
scale 0-100
Source
Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB)
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
195 places, 1,746 data points, 2016–2024
Last refreshed

The data infrastructure pillar overall score measures the hard and soft infrastructure segments, itemizing essential cross cutting requirements for an effective statistical system. The segments are: (i) legislation and governance covering the existence of laws and a functioning institutional framework for the statistical system; (ii) standards and methods addressing compliance with recognized frameworks and concepts; (iii) skills including level of skills within the statistical system and among users (statistical literacy); (iv) partnerships reflecting the need for the statistical system to be inclusive and coherent; and (v) finance mobilized both domestically and from donors.