Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Vanuatu: Statistical performance: Pillar 5 data infrastructure score
Statistical performance: Pillar 5 data infrastructure score over time
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 35 scale 0-100 against 35 scale 0-100 in Vanuatu, a difference of 0 scale 0-100.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 174th and Vanuatu ranks 174th of 192 countries.
Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Kitts and Nevis | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 22.5 scale 0-100 | 16.25 scale 0-100 | 6.25 scale 0-100 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
| 2020s | 32 scale 0-100 | 31 scale 0-100 | 1 scale 0-100 | Saint Kitts and Nevis |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data, Saint Kitts and Nevis or Vanuatu?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 35 scale 0-100 against 35 scale 0-100 in Vanuatu as of 2024.
- What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Vanuatu?
- 0 scale 0-100, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Vanuatu?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
- How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Vanuatu rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 174th and Vanuatu ranks 174th of 192 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The data infrastructure pillar overall score measures the hard and soft infrastructure segments, itemizing essential cross cutting requirements for an effective statistical system. The segments are: (i) legislation and governance covering the existence of laws and a functioning institutional framework for the statistical system; (ii) standards and methods addressing compliance with recognized frameworks and concepts; (iii) skills including level of skills within the statistical system and among users (statistical literacy); (iv) partnerships reflecting the need for the statistical system to be inclusive and coherent; and (v) finance mobilized both domestically and from donors.