Syrian Arab Republic vs Viet Nam: Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure
Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure over time
- Syrian Arab Republic
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Syrian Arab Republic currently reports 40 scale 0-100 against 40 scale 0-100 in Viet Nam, a difference of 0 scale 0-100.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Viet Nam has been ahead every year.
Syrian Arab Republic ranks 161st and Viet Nam ranks 161st of 191 countries.
Viet Nam has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Syrian Arab Republic | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 23.75 scale 0-100 | 32.5 scale 0-100 | 8.75 scale 0-100 | Viet Nam |
| 2020s | 32 scale 0-100 | 41 scale 0-100 | 9 scale 0-100 | Viet Nam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data infrastructure, Syrian Arab Republic or Viet Nam?
- Syrian Arab Republic, at 40 scale 0-100 against 40 scale 0-100 in Viet Nam as of 2024.
- What is the difference in statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data infrastructure between Syrian Arab Republic and Viet Nam?
- 0 scale 0-100, with Syrian Arab Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Syrian Arab Republic and Viet Nam?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2024.
- How do Syrian Arab Republic and Viet Nam rank globally for statistical performance indicators (spi): pillar 5 data infrastructure?
- Syrian Arab Republic ranks 161st and Viet Nam ranks 161st of 191 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statistical Performance Indicators, World Bank (WB), published as Statistical performance indicators (SPI): Pillar 5 data infrastructure score (scale 0-100). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The data infrastructure pillar overall score measures the hard and soft infrastructure segments, itemizing essential cross cutting requirements for an effective statistical system. The segments are: (i) legislation and governance covering the existence of laws and a functioning institutional framework for the statistical system; (ii) standards and methods addressing compliance with recognized frameworks and concepts; (iii) skills including level of skills within the statistical system and among users (statistical literacy); (iv) partnerships reflecting the need for the statistical system to be inclusive and coherent; and (v) finance mobilized both domestically and from donors.