Australia vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Subsidies, payable, Ratio of this level of government's expenditure

Australia
0.8313
in 2020
Bosnia and Herzegovina
0.833
in 2020
Australia rank
37th
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
36th

Subsidies, payable, Ratio of this level of government's expenditure over time

  • Australia
  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
00.20.40.60.8199920092020

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 0.833 against 0.8313 in Australia, a difference of 0.0017.

Across all 16 years both countries report, Bosnia and Herzegovina has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 37th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 36th of 75 countries.

Bosnia and Herzegovina has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Bosnia and Herzegovina Difference Ahead
2000s 0.4937 0.8475 0.3538 Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 0.5788 0.8052 0.2264 Bosnia and Herzegovina
2020s 0.8313 0.833 0.0017 Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher subsidies, payable, ratio of this level of government's expenditure, Australia or Bosnia and Herzegovina?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 0.833 against 0.8313 in Australia as of 2020.
What is the difference in subsidies, payable, ratio of this level of government's expenditure between Australia and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
0.0017, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Bosnia and Herzegovina?
16 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2020.
How do Australia and Bosnia and Herzegovina rank globally for subsidies, payable, ratio of this level of government's expenditure?
Australia ranks 37th and Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 36th of 75 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Subsidies, payable, Ratio of this level of government's expenditure on this item to total general government expenditure on this, Percent (Central government). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Subsidies, payable, Ratio of this level of government's expenditure. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/subsidies-payable-ratio-of-this-level-of-government-s-expenditure-on-this-item-to-total/australia/bosnia-and-herzegovina/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://public-sector.statizoid.com/compare/subsidies-payable-ratio-of-this-level-of-government-s-expenditure-on-this-item-to-total/australia/bosnia-and-herzegovina/">Australia vs Bosnia and Herzegovina: Subsidies, payable, Ratio of this level of government's expenditure</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Subsidies, payable, Ratio of this level of government's expenditure on this item to total general government expenditure on this, Percent (Central government)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
75 places, 1,429 data points, 1990–2020
Last refreshed

The Fiscal Decentralization dataset includes fiscal decentralization indicators for a sample of IMF member countries. The following indicators are included in the dataset: Revenue and Expenditure Decentralization Shares; Transfer dependency and Vertical Fiscal Imbalances; Deficit and Debt; Allocation of expenditure (economic classification); Allocation of expenditure (functional classification); Allocation of non-Tax Revenues; and Allocation of Taxes.