Argentina vs Uzbekistan: Tax revenue (current LCU), gaps filled
Argentina
60.90 trillion current LCU
in 2024
Uzbekistan
138.87 trillion current LCU
in 2023
Argentina rank
7th
Uzbekistan rank
6th
Tax revenue (current LCU), gaps filled over time
- Argentina
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 138.87 trillion current LCU against 60.90 trillion current LCU in Argentina, a difference of 77.98 trillion current LCU.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 2.3 times Argentina's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
Argentina ranks 7th and Uzbekistan ranks 6th of 157 countries.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 910.25 billion current LCU | 33.84 trillion current LCU | 32.93 trillion current LCU | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 9.11 trillion current LCU | 114.35 trillion current LCU | 105.25 trillion current LCU | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher tax revenue (current lcu), gaps filled, Argentina or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 138.87 trillion current LCU against 60.90 trillion current LCU in Argentina as of 2023.
- What is the difference in tax revenue (current lcu), gaps filled between Argentina and Uzbekistan?
- 77.98 trillion current LCU, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Uzbekistan?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Uzbekistan rank globally for tax revenue (current lcu), gaps filled?
- Argentina ranks 7th and Uzbekistan ranks 6th of 157 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Tax revenue (current LCU), gaps filled. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Tax revenue (current LCU) with 50 missing years estimated by linear interpolation between the nearest real observations. Only gaps of 4 years or fewer are filled, and never beyond the first or last actual measurement — these are filled holes, not forecasts.